글번호
5478649
작성일
20.04.29 13:42:27
조회수
6
글쓴이
국제관계연구소
Vol 34-3 (December 2019): Institutional Origins of the US–China Trade War: The Concurrence of America's Limited Legal Leverage and China's Overproduction (Youcheer Kim & Yongshin Kim)

Abstract

This paper examines why the United States and China could not accommodate their trade disputes within the framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO), which now escalated into a rhetorical and retaliatory tariff war. The existing literature, which assumes the dominance of US institutional power in the WTO litigation process, has not anticipated the administration's current gambit that has ignited a trade war with China. Specifically, many liberalminded pundits and public alike were puzzled by the United States imposing selfdestructive tariff measures against the WTO rules, despite the WTO still remains as an effective tool and resource for America's trade policies. Against such a backdrop, this paper claims that the concurrence of America's limited legal leverage in the WTO and China's domestic industrial structure that induces overproduction substantially explains the puzzle. To support this central claim, the paper conducts a comparative case analysis of USChina disputes in two industrial domains: steelmaking and renewable energy, including solar photovoltaic (PV) power and wind power. Despite contrasting domestic industrial structures and sectoral characteristics, the case study shows a similar pattern present in China's successful legal maneuvers and US strategic failures. Furthermore, the study also reveals the structural causes of overproduction beyond the Chinese central authority's managerial capacity.

 

첨부파일 첨부파일이(가) 없습니다.
다음글 Vol 34-3 (December 2019): Understanding Trump's Trade Policy with China: International Pressures Meet Domestic Politics (Zhaohui Wang)
이전글 Vol 34-3 (December 2019): A Role for India in the Korean Peace Process: Contemplating Non‐Realist Approaches to Broaden Relations with the Korean Peninsula(Dean J. Ouellette)