글번호
5508470
작성일
21.08.26 14:31:56
조회수
73
글쓴이
국제관계연구소
Vol. 36-2 (August 2021) Framing Immigrant Rights in Politics: Comparative Evidence From Japan and South Korea (Kyunghwan Kim)
The aim of this study is to analyse and compare how the rights of lowskilled labour migrants have been formed and developed in Japan and
South Korea, from a discursive institutionalist perspective. Over the last
two decades, interestingly, the two East Asian nation-states, although having similar policy legacies of East Asian welfare and immigration regimes
(productivism and ethnic nationalism), have demonstrated different policy
developments regarding the two groups of low-skilled labour migrants,
resulting in different paths in terms of their rights – i.e., persistent ethnic
differentiation in Japan and ethnically hierarchical inclusion in Korea.
This article argues that the rationale behind the difference between Japan
and Korea can be found in their different discursive interaction processes
of policy legacies and alternative policy ideas (human rights and multiculturalism). That is to say, policy legacies have legitimised and strengthened
the existing policy paradigms of low-skilled foreign-born populations –
i.e., ethnic differentiation in Japan and differential exclusion in Korea,
whereas alternative ideas have reinforced and/or challenged the paradigms, thereby engendering different approaches to the inclusion/exclusion
of low-skilled labour migrants.

Key words: immigrant rights, policy ideas, discursive institutionalism,
Japan, Korea
다음글 Vol. 36-2 (August 2021) Informal and Reliable: Bolivian Immigrants in Korean Sewing Workshops in the Argentine Garment Industry (Jihye Kim)
이전글 Vol. 36-2 (August 2021) Courting Foreign Direct Investment from Diasporas: Are Diaspora Engagement Policies Effective? Under What Conditions? (Seungbin Park)